|
(login required)
|
New Partnership Agreement (May 19, 2000)
Four year Partnership with the University of California
(1999-2000 through 2002-03)
State Funding Commitments
Proposed UC Commitments
State Funding Commitments:
4% annual
increase to the State General Fund base plus funding for enrollment
growth, consistent with access under the Master Plan (estimated
to be 3% annually) at the agreed-upon marginal rate adjusted annually
(in 2000-01 the rate is $8,539).
- An additional
1% increase to the State General Fund base to phase in full funding
to eliminate the annual budgetary shortfalls for ongoing building
maintenance, instructional equipment, instructional technology,
and libraries between 1999-00 and 2002-03.
- Funds for
debt service related to capital outlay.
- Funds for
annuitant benefits.
- One-time
funding, contingent upon the State's financial position, for high
priority needs such as deferred maintenance, libraries, equipment,
instructional technology, and capital outlay.
- Funding
for new or expanded special initiatives or programs, such as the
development of off-campus centers or the opening of new campuses,
special research initiatives, outreach and public service programs
to improve K-12 schools, the transition to year-round operations,
as well as the cost of legislation approved by the State.
- $210 million
for each segment, consistent with Proposition 1A, annually to
support capital outlay needs. Support for State general obligation
bond measure and/or lease revenue bonds that would provide additional
support for capital outlay needs beginning in 2002-03.
- Revenue
equivalent to that which would be generated from annual increases
in mandatory systemwide fees and in Fees for Selected Professional
School students of no more than the increase in California per
capita personal income.
- Annual review
of Partnership Goals and the specified performance data by the
Office of the Secretary for Education and the Department of Finance
to assess the progress UC is making in meeting these goals. The
level of success shall determine whether the State will provide
the full funding commitment.
UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA (UC) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Proposed
UC Commitments:
I.
Commitment to Improving Access to a Quality Undergraduate Education
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Ensure
access under the Master Plan. |
Maintain
commitment to accept all eligible California high school graduates
who wish to attend. To accommodate projected annual enrollment
growth of about 3%, or 5,000 students per year, examine a range
of options including, but not limited to, adjustments to current
long-range development plans, more intensive use of facilities
during the summer, and the development of off-campus centers. |
Continue
to provide a student outcomes report in October each year.
Include in this report admissions and enrollment data.
|
| Provide
classes needed for students to graduate in four years or less. |
Hire
sufficient faculty to at least reach the current budgeted student
faculty ratio of 18.7 to one and to ensure no further deterioration.
The longer-term goal is to phase in a return to the historical
student faculty ratio of 17.6 to one, with the increase in faculty
devoted to improving the quality of undergraduate education
by providing more seminars and reducing class size. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on actual and budgeted enrollment
and faculty.
|
| x |
Continue
commitment to maintain improved student outcomes. More students
are graduating sooner and at greater rates than in any other
time (average time to degree is 4.2 years, compared to 4.4 years
for students admitted in 1984. The percent of students who graduate
in four years, five years, and six years has continued to improve.
For example, looking at graduation rates over a long period,
about 70% of enrolled freshmen now graduate within 5 years or
less, compared to the 1950s when 50% of students graduated in
six years or less. |
Continue
to provide graduation and persistence rates, time to degree,
and degrees conferred data in the student outcomes report
each year.
|
|
With
regard to students who enter as freshmen, eliminate State funding,
including financial aid, for those who exceed the required credit
units for their current degree program by more than 20%. |
Report
in October, 2000 on progress in implementing this goal.
|
| Increase
faculty teaching loads.
|
Continue
commitment to maintain the agreed-upon 6.7% increase in faculty
teaching workload. |
Provide
report in March each year on undergraduate instruction and faculty
workload. |
| Ensure
that new top 4% "path" (provides that the top 4% of each graduating
class from each California public high school are eligible for
admission to UC) results in more students eligible for and successfully
attending UC. |
Increase
percentage of qualifying students from low-participating schools
statewide who successfully complete UC college preparatory courses.
Develop
an implementation and evaluation plan for the "4% path". Include
references to special services that may be needed to ensure
that students admitted through the "4% path" succeed at UC.
Beginning
in 2001, increase percentage of students from low-participating
high schools who enroll in UC.
|
In
November , 2001: •Provide
a report on the percentage of students in low-participating
high schools who complete 11 of 15 A-F courses by end of
junior year (or other proxy measure, such as algebra) and
otherwise meet the eligibility requirements delineated in
the Regents' policy on the "4% path".
In
March , 2002:
•Provide
a report on the percentage of students from low-participating
high schools who enroll as freshmen in UC.
•Include
other implementation data as appropriate, to be determined
by UC.
•Outcomes
will be reported as part of the CPEC eligibility study.
|
| x |
Continue
policy of no State funding for remedial courses. Use California
Community Colleges (CCC) and extension classes to provide remedial
education, to the extent possible. |
Continue
to provide information on remedial education in the report
on student outcomes report each year.
|
| x |
Increase
investment in instructional technology to ensure students have
access to state-of-the art technology for learning and conducting
research. |
Report
each year in Regents Budget on progress in improving instructional
technology for students.
|
| Provide
competitive faculty salaries. |
Continue
to maintain commitment to provide competitive faculty salaries
using the California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC)
methodology. |
Continue
to provide annual report to CPEC on faculty salaries.
|
| Increase
emphasis on merit-based pay systems. |
Continue
to emphasize a merit-based pay system to reward the most outstanding
faculty. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on faculty salaries and
merit increases for faculty.
|
| Enroll
students at a 10th campus in Merced, provided adequate
resources are available, to provide increased access to students
in the Central Valley, which historically have had low UC-participation
rates. UC should do all it can to open the campus by 2004-05
and enroll students in academic programs even before the campus
opens. |
Submit
a revised plan by April 1, 2000 that reflects the goal of opening
the Merced campus by 2004-05, including the major milestones
regarding planning activities.
By May
2001, or as soon as possible upon completion of the campus
long-range development plan and associated environmental analyses
required by state and federal law, identify infrastructure
and capital needs, related costs, and methods of financing
these needs including the leverage of other public or private
sources of funding.
|
By
October each year, provide a progress report on development
of the Merced campus and include in this report data on
enrollment of students in UC's general campuses from those
counties in the Central Valley that have been historically
underrepresented at UC.
•Include
in annual report on Merced information on actions taken
to meet the goal of opening by 2004-05.
|
| |
Develop
an academic plan for the campus. |
Submit
plan by Spring, 2002.
|
| |
Continue
development of academic programs that would enable enrollment
of first students in Merced programs earlier than opening of
the campus. |
Include
in annual report on Merced actions taken to enroll students
earlier than the opening of the campus.
|
| |
Work
with Governor's University of California Merced Implementation
Team to explore ways to streamline the review and approval process
of multiple state and federal agencies and ensure these processes
are accomplished in a manner that allows the Merced campus to
break ground in 2001. |
Include
in annual report on Merced actions taken by the Implementation
Team to speed development of the Merced campus.
|
| |
Continue
to implement student academic development programs and K-12
partnerships in the Central Valley to increase UC eligibility
and promote increases in the enrollment of UC-eligible students
from the Central Valley at UC's general campuses. |
Include
in annual report on Merced activities and progress of outreach
programs intended to promote increases in enrollment of
UC-eligible students from the Central Valley at UC's general
campuses.
|
| |
Increase
the number of Central Valley residents participating in higher
education programs at the distributed learning centers funded
in the 1998 Budget Act from 14,000 in 1999-00 to 60,000 by 2004-05. |
Include
in annual report on Merced information on enrollment of
students from the Central Valley at distributed learning
centers.
|
| Expand
intersegmental transfers. |
To
the extent that the CCCs increase the number of "transfer ready"
students: (1) increase the total number of CCC transfers to
UC by 6% annually over 7 years (from 10,150 in 1998-99 to 15,300
in 2005-06), and (2) increase the number of student transfers
from low-transfer CCCs by 15% annually. |
Provide
a report by October each year on progress in meeting CCC
transfer goals. Include in this report the total number
of transfers and number of transfers from low-participation
colleges.
|
| Reduce
barriers to students transferring among segments. Work with
CCCs to ensure the ease of the transfer function and expand
course transferability. |
Develop
and maintain systemwide agreements between UC, California State
University (CSU), and CCC on lower-division course requirements
for 20 high-demand majors (at a rate of 3-5 per year) by 2005-06.
The long-term vision is to ensure that a qualified student from
any CCC has the opportunity to transfer to any UC (or CSU) campus
and have their courses accepted for their major. |
Include
in annual report on CCC transfers information on the progress
made in developing systemwide agreements for high-demand
majors. Also include in this report a list of systemwide
agreements developed.
|
| x |
Ensure
that each of UC's general campuses has articulation agreements
with 100% of the CCCs within their respective service areas. |
For
each UC campus, include status of articulation agreements
with each CCC in its service area in the annual report on
CCC transfers.
|
| x |
Maintain
current programs that provide, for example, transfer-specific
training for CCC counselors, transfer agreements, and increased
access to transfer information. |
Include
in the annual report on CCC transfers information on improving
access to information about transfer.
|
| x |
Continue
to use the Intersegmental General Education Transfer Curriculum
(IGETC), allowing students to complete all UC general education
requirements before transferring. |
Include
in the annual report on CCC transfers information on use
of the IGETC.
|
| x |
Work
with CSU and CCC to ensure that transfer students are taking
the appropriate required courses and will receive credit for
classes they have taken. This can be accomplished by September
2001 in a number of ways, including Articulation System Stimulating
Interinstitutional Student Transfer (ASSIST), a common course
numbering system, or IGETC. |
Include
in the annual report on CCC transfers information on progress
toward achieving this goal.
|
| Implement
more extensive use of existing facilities to accommodate enrollment
demands and to help alleviate enrollment pressures during the
regular academic year. |
Reach
agreement with the Administration and the Legislature on a plan
for phasing in implementation of a state-supported summer term
on a campus-by-campus basis beginning in Summer 2001. The phasing
plan should be based on the assumption that fees, financial
aid, and the quality of programs should be similar to that offered
during the regular academic year. |
Include
phasing plan in final agreement on budget for 2000-01.
•By
October 1 each year provide a progress report on implementation
of year-round operations.
|
| |
Space
requests for classrooms and class laboratories will be justified
using legislatively approved utilization standards and the assumption
of a summer term enrollment of 40% of fall/ winter/ spring enrollment,
consistent with the approved phasing plan for implementation
of year-round operations. |
Include
justification of space in Regents Budget each year.
|
| x |
Examine
incentives to encourage more students to attend classes in the
summer and more faculty to teach in the summer. |
Report
by October 1, 2000 on incentives to encourage more students
to attend class in the summer and more faculty to teach
in the summer.
|
| x |
Provide
funding for existing summer enrollment of UC-matriculated students
if agreement is reached. |
Include
in phasing plan funding for existing summer enrollment.
|
| x |
Consider
developing off-campus centers to accommodate increased enrollment
demand. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on progress in developing
off-campus centers.
|
II. Improving Integration and Coordination within California's Educational
System
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Assume
greater responsibility in working with K-12 schools towards
improving K-12 student performance. |
High
schools participating in UC partnerships are expected to demonstrate
greater educational achievements compared to prior years and
in comparison to similar high schools that do not participate
in partnerships. Students in participating high schools are
expected to successfully complete college preparatory courses
at a higher rate than prior years. Success is predicated upon
a commitment from both UC and participating high schools. To
the extent it is possible to collect data, UC will compare the
performance of students in participating high schools with that
of students in non-participating high schools. |
By
October, 2001:
•Report
first results of long-term outreach evaluation.
•By
October of each year, provide a progress report on outreach
and K-12 improvement programs and include in the report
the following:
•Proportion
of students completing A-G requirements.
•Percentage
of students eligible for UC from schools where UC outreach
is operational.
•other
data as appropriate to indicate college readiness.
|
| x |
Expand
efforts to increase educational opportunity and improve the
academic preparedness of K-12 students, especially students
from disadvantaged backgrounds, and to reduce the disparities
in educational opportunities and achievement. Consistent with
goals of the Outreach Task Force, UC is working to expand:
•K-12
school partnerships, which seek to ensure that students
have access to high quality instruction and are able to
meet the A - G course requirements.
•traditional
student-centered programs such as Mathematics, Engineering,
Science Achievement (MESA), Puente, and Early Academic Outreach
Program (EAOP).
•academic
outreach in the Central Valley (including those counties
which have been historically underrepresented at UC).
|
Include
in October report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs
information on the progress toward meeting the goals specified
in the Outreach Task Force Report.
|
| x |
Expand
outreach programs aimed at attracting more students from disadvantaged
backgrounds into graduate and professional school programs |
Include
in the annual report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs
information on expansion of graduate and professional school
outreach programs and include in the report number of participants
and other evaluation data as appropriate.
|
| x |
Expand
AP Online program to make Advanced Placement and honors courses
available to students who attend high schools that offer few
or no AP courses. |
Include
in the annual report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs,
the number of courses provided on-line each year and the
number of students completing the courses.
|
| x |
Expand
SAT test preparation programs, including through the California
Digital High School. |
Include
in the annual report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs
the number of students participating in SAT test preparation
programs, including those UC operates through the Digital
High School.
|
| Provide
better and more timely information to students, families, teachers,
and counselors to improve planning and preparation for college. |
Expand
visits to K-12 schools, counseling programs, public affairs
programs, community and media relations activities, telephone
and direct mail campaigns in order to better inform students,
schools, and parents about UC eligibility requirements.
UC's stated
goal in the Outreach Task Force Report is to increase the
number of outreach contacts with elementary, middle school,
high school, and community college students and families by
200 percent over the number of contacts now made with these
groups.
|
Include
in the annual report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs
progress toward meeting the goals specified in Outreach
Task Force Report.
|
| Evaluate
the effectiveness of outreach programs to ensure that resources
are focused on the most successful programs. |
Enhance
research on instructional strategies that can assist under-performing
schools and students. |
Include
in the annual report on outreach and K-12 improvement programs
the number of effective teaching strategies researched,
disseminated and/or published, and implemented in under-performing
K-12 schools.
|
III.
Meeting Teacher Demand and Improving the Quality of Teacher Preparation
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Increase
UC commitment to meeting the demand for new teachers. |
Commit
to a goal of increasing the number of students enrolled in teacher
credential programs from approximately 1,000 in 1998-99 to 2,500
by 2002-03, with a focus on increasing the number of first-time
and new type credentials in math and science. This would more
than double the number of teachers prepared by UC in 1998-99.
Increase the number of UC student internships, particularly
in mathematics and science at the middle and high school level.
Implement
initiative to attract well-qualified students into the teaching
profession by offering students with a BA, especially those
with degrees in math and science where there is a shortage
of well-qualified teachers, the opportunity to earn a teaching
credential over two summers and to teach in the intervening
year using an emergency credential.
|
In
October of each year, provide a report on teacher credential
programs that includes the following information:
•Total
number of students enrolled in both post-baccalaureate and
masters credential programs. Number
of students recommended for first-time and new type credentials
in total and in mathematics and science.
Number
of UC student internships, by field and school level.
Passage
rate on California Basic Educational Skills Tests (CBEST)
and other statewide exams required to receive a credential.
|
| x |
Develop
and implement Teacher Scholars Program by 2001-02 to provide
400 students the opportunity to earn a combined Masters' and
Teacher Credential in 15-months. |
Include
in the annual report on teacher credential programs the
number of students who enroll in and complete the program.
|
x
|
Develop
and implement the Principal Leadership Training Program by 2002-03
to provide 400 students with rigorous leadership training. |
Include
in the annual report on teacher credential programs the
number of students who enroll in and complete the program.
|
| Improve
teacher preparation to ensure that teacher education programs
adapt quickly to meet K-12 academic standards. |
Implement
teacher preparation reforms consistent with SB 2042 and Commission
on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) standards in the following areas:
•provision
of pre-internship, internship, and integrated undergraduate
programs;
•curriculum
consistent with standards for the teaching profession and
with curriculum and performance standards for K-12 students;
•integration
of theory and practice in all programs;
•implementation
of candidate performance assessment;
•collaboration
across university academic departments and with K-12 schools;
and flexible course scheduling (e.g., evenings, weekends,
intensive short courses.
|
Include
in the annual report on teacher credential programs a progress
report on the extent to which reforms have been implemented.
(The reporting format will be developed by OSE and DOF and
include a campus rating system that can be summarized at
the systemwide level as well as concise campus-level back-up.)
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, expand the California
Subject Matter Projects to 170 sites serving 35,000 K-12 teachers
through institutes and other activities aimed at improving participants'
content knowledge and pedagogical practice in nine core areas
of the K-12 curriculum. |
Provide
the results of the four-year independent evaluation of CSMPs,
consistent with AB 1734 (Mazzoni), due to the State Board
of Education, the Governor, and the Legislature by July
1, 2002.
|
| |
|
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement Governor's
Professional Reading Development Institutes to provide professional
training for 20,000 teachers in pre-Kindergarten and in grades
K-3. |
In
October of each year provide a progress report on K-12 Teacher
Professional Development Programs and include the number
of participants who participated in this program and other
evaluation data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement English
Language Development Institutes to provide professional training
for 5,000 English language learner teachers in grades 4-8 and
5,000 English language learner teachers in grades 9-12. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement Algebra
Institutes to provide professional training for 2,500 teachers
in grades 7-10 in Algebra. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement Mathematics
Specialists Institutes to prepare 5,000 Math teachers in grades
4-6 to assume leadership roles within their schools to improve
the instruction of Math. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement High
School Mathematics Institutes to provide professional training
for 8,000 high school teachers in Math. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement High
School English Institutes to provide professional training for
12,000 high school teachers in English. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
In
cooperation with CSU and private institutions, implement the
Pre-Algebra and Algebra Academies to provide professional training
for 1,000 teachers in grades 7-8 linked with summer school instruction
for K-12 students in Pre-Algebra and Algebra. |
Include
in the October report on K-12 Teacher Development Programs
the number of participants in this program and other evaluation
data as appropriate.
|
| x |
Work
closely with K-12 in the development of charter schools and
conduct research on the degree to which charter schools achieve
intended outcomes. |
Report
annually on test scores of students at UCSD charter school
in comparison with public and private school students.
•Broadly
disseminate research findings of UCSD charter school program.
|
IV.
Productivity Improvements
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Maintain
and renovate existing campuses. |
Approximately
50% of the State capital outlay dollars will be used to address
seismic, life-safety and modernization needs of existing facilities,
and about 50% to support enrollment-growth related projects. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on distribution of state
capital funds among seismic, renovation, and enrollment
growth projects.
|
| x |
In
the next few years, enrollment growth-related projects will
focus on science facilities for high-tech workforce. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on extent to which growth-related
projects are focused on the sciences.
|
| Decrease
current deferred maintenance backlogs. |
Maintain
commitment to provide annual increase of $6 million from the
operating budget (UC funds) to pay for long-term financing of
high-priority deferred maintenance projects. This should allow
UC to fund about $60 million of projects each year. |
In
October of each year, provide an annual report on deferred
maintenance projects funded from these funds.
|
| x |
Use
streamlined capital outlay process to complete projects in a
timely way at a lower cost. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on the progress of streamlined
projects.
|
VII.
Maintaining California's Competitiveness
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Place
a priority on producing graduates who will meet California's
workforce needs. |
Implement
Engineering and Computer Sciences Initiatives to increase undergraduate
and graduate students in these disciplines by at least 1,000
students annually through 2005-06. This is a 50% increase over
1997-98 (from 16,000 students in 1997-98 to 24,000 students
in 2005-06). |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on the increases in these
programs.
|
| Increase
use of public-private partnerships to further economic development
of the State. |
Increase
research efforts that will help California maintain its competitiveness
in a global economy that is increasingly knowledge-based. Expand
the Industry-University Cooperative Research Program that targets
research of economic importance to California. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on progress of public-private
partnerships.
|
|
Implement
three California Institutes for Science and Innovation to create
world-class centers for strategic innovation that combine cutting-edge
research with collaboration and training for the next generation
of scientists and technological leaders. Funding of $75 million
each year for four years will be provided by the state to fund
the capital and core operational costs of the institutes. UC
will match the funding on a two-to-one basis with non-state
funds, including private and federal funds, provided for both
operating and capital purposes. Consideration should be given
to establishing additional Institutes in subsequent years. |
In
October of each year, provide annual progress report on
implementation of the institutes and acquisition of matching
funds.
|
| x |
In
order to help maintain quality, seek additional private resources
and increase UC's share of federal research dollars. |
Report
each year in the Regents Budget on additional private and
federal funding.
|
VIII.
Improving the Academic Experience
|
Objective
|
Indicator
|
Performance
Data
|
| Provide
opportunities for all students to participate in community service
or service learning. |
Increase
the number of UC students who engage in community service or
complete a service learning experience. |
Increase
student participation in community service and service learning
based on funding provided.
|
| In Regents Budget |
| Year-Round Operation Report |
| CAL-ISI
Report |
| Student
Access and Outcomes Report |
| Merced Campus Report |
| Community College Transfers
Report |
| Report on Outreach and
K-12 Improvement Programs |
| Report on Teacher Credential
Programs |
| Report on K-12 Teacher
Professional Development Programs |
| Additional Reports: |
| Commitment to Improving
Access to a Quality Undergraduate Education |
| Meeting Teacher Demand
and Improving the Quality of Teacher Preparation |
| Productivity Improvements |
NOTE:
All performance data will be reported annually by September 15,
beginning in 2000, unless otherwise specified.
Email your
questions/comments to Debora
Obley.
For best results,
print document using "Landscape" page orientation.
|